Stratfor Geopolitical Intelligence Report
New Orleans: A Geopolitical Prize By George Friedman

 The American political system was founded in Philadelphia, but the
American nation was built on the vast farmlands that stretch from the
Alleghenies to the Rockies. That farmland produced the wealth that
funded American industrialization: It permitted the formation of a
class of small landholders who, amazingly, could produce more than they
could consume. They could sell their excess crops in the east and in
Europe and save that money, which eventually became the founding
capital of American industry.

 But it was not the extraordinary land nor the farmers and ranchers who
alone set the process in motion. Rather, it was geography -- the
extraordinary system of rivers that flowed through the Midwest and
allowed them to ship their surplus to the rest of the world. All of the
rivers flowed into one -- the Mississippi -- and the Mississippi flowed
to the ports in and around one city: New Orleans. It was in New Orleans
that the barges from upstream were unloaded and their cargos stored,
sold and reloaded on ocean-going vessels. Until last Sunday, New
Orleans was, in many ways, the pivot of the American economy.

 For that reason, the Battle of New Orleans in January 1815 was a key
moment in American history. Even though the battle occurred after the
War of 1812 was over, had the British taken New Orleans, we suspect
they wouldn't have given it back. Without New Orleans, the entire
Louisiana Purchase would have been valueless to the United States. Or,
to state it more precisely, the British would control the region
because, at the end of the day, the value of the Purchase was the land
and the rivers - which all converged on the Mississippi and the
ultimate port of New Orleans. The hero of the battle was Andrew
Jackson, and when he became president, his obsession with Texas had
much to do with keeping the Mexicans away from New Orleans.

 During the Cold War, a macabre topic of discussion among bored
graduate students who studied such things was this: If the Soviets
could destroy one city with a large nuclear device, which would it be?
The usual answers were Washington or New York. For me, the answer was
simple: New Orleans. If the Mississippi River was shut to traffic, then
the foundations of the economy would be shattered. The industrial
minerals needed in the factories wouldn't come in, and the agricultural
wealth wouldn't flow out. Alternative routes really weren't available.
The Germans knew it too: A U-boat campaign occurred near the mouth of
the Mississippi during World War II. Both the Germans and Stratfor have
stood with Andy Jackson: New Orleans was the prize.

 Last Sunday, nature took out New Orleans almost as surely as a nuclear
strike. Hurricane Katrina's geopolitical effect was not, in many ways,
distinguishable from a mushroom cloud. The key exit from North America
was closed. The petrochemical industry, which has become an added value
to the region since Jackson's days, was at risk. The navigability of
the Mississippi south of New Orleans was a question mark. New Orleans
as a city and as a port complex had ceased to exist, and it was not
clear that it could recover.

 The Ports of South Louisiana and New Orleans, which run north and
south of the city, are as important today as at any point during the
history of the republic. On its own merit, POSL is the largest port in
the United States by tonnage and the fifth-largest in the world. It
exports more than 52 million tons a year, of which more than half are
agricultural products -- corn, soybeans and so on. A large proportion
of U.S. agriculture flows out of the port. Almost as much cargo, nearly
17 million tons, comes in through the port -- including not only crude
oil, but chemicals and fertilizers, coal, concrete and so on.

 A simple way to think about the New Orleans port complex is that it is
where the bulk commodities of agriculture go out to the world and the
bulk commodities of industrialism come in. The commodity chain of the
global food industry starts here, as does that of American
industrialism. If these facilities are gone, more than the price of
goods shifts: The very physical structure of the global economy would
have to be reshaped. Consider the impact to the U.S. auto industry if
steel doesn't come up the river, or the effect on global food supplies
if U.S. corn and soybeans don't get to the markets.

 The problem is that there are no good shipping alternatives. River
transport is cheap, and most of the commodities we are discussing have
low value-to-weight ratios. The U.S. transport system was built on the
assumption that these commodities would travel to and from New Orleans
by barge, where they would be loaded on ships or offloaded. Apart from
port capacity elsewhere in the United States, there aren't enough
trucks or rail cars to handle the long-distance hauling of these
enormous quantities -- assuming for the moment that the economics could
be managed, which they can't be.

 The focus in the media has been on the oil industry in Louisiana and
Mississippi. This is not a trivial question, but in a certain sense, it
is dwarfed by the shipping issue. First, Louisiana is the source of
about 15 percent of U.S.-produced petroleum, much of it from the Gulf.
The local refineries are critical to American infrastructure. Were all
of these facilities to be lost, the effect on the price of oil
worldwide would be extraordinarily painful. If the river itself became
unnavigable or if the ports are no longer functioning, however, the
impact to the wider economy would be significantly more severe. In a
sense, there is more flexibility in oil than in the physical transport
of these other commodities.

 There is clearly good news as information comes in. By all accounts,
the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, which services supertankers in the
Gulf, is intact. Port Fourchon, which is the center of extraction
operations in the Gulf, has sustained damage but is recoverable. The
status of the oil platforms is unclear and it is not known what the
underwater systems look like, but on the surface, the damage - though
not trivial -- is manageable.

 The news on the river is also far better than would have been expected
on Sunday. The river has not changed its course. No major levees
containing the river have burst. The Mississippi apparently has not
silted up to such an extent that massive dredging would be required to
render it navigable. Even the port facilities, although apparently
damaged in many places and destroyed in few, are still there. The
river, as transport corridor, has not been lost.

 What has been lost is the city of New Orleans and many of the
residential suburban areas around it. The population has fled, leaving
behind a relatively small number of people in desperate straits. Some
are dead, others are dying, and the magnitude of the situation dwarfs
the resources required to ameliorate their condition. But it is not the
population that is trapped in New Orleans that is of geopolitical
significance: It is the population that has left and has nowhere to
return to.

 The oil fields, pipelines and ports required a skilled workforce in
order to operate. That workforce requires homes. They require stores to
buy food and other supplies. Hospitals and doctors. Schools for their
children. In other words, in order to operate the facilities critical
to the United States, you need a workforce to do it -- and that
workforce is gone. Unlike in other disasters, that workforce cannot
return to the region because they have no place to live. New Orleans is
gone, and the metropolitan area surrounding New Orleans is either gone
or so badly damaged that it will not be inhabitable for a long time.

 It is possible to jury-rig around this problem for a short time. But
the fact is that those who have left the area have gone to live with
relatives and friends. Those who had the ability to leave also had
networks of relationships and resources to manage their exile. But
those resources are not infinite -- and as it becomes apparent that
these people will not be returning to New Orleans any time soon, they
will be enrolling their children in new schools, finding new jobs,
finding new accommodations. If they have any insurance money coming,
they will collect it. If they have none, then -- whatever emotional
connections they may have to their home -- their economic connection to
it has been severed. In a very short time, these people will be making
decisions that will start to reshape population and workforce patterns
in the region.

 A city is a complex and ongoing process - one that requires physical
infrastructure to support the people who live in it and people to
operate that physical infrastructure. We don't simply mean power plants
or sewage treatment facilities, although they are critical. Someone has
to be able to sell a bottle of milk or a new shirt. Someone has to be
able to repair a car or do surgery. And the people who do those things,
along with the infrastructure that supports them, are gone -- and they
are not coming back anytime soon.

 It is in this sense, then, that it seems almost as if a nuclear weapon
went off in New Orleans. The people mostly have fled rather than died,
but they are gone. Not all of the facilities are destroyed, but most
are. It appears to us that New Orleans and its environs have passed the
point of recoverability. The area can recover, to be sure, but only
with the commitment of massive resources from outside -- and those
resources would always be at risk to another Katrina.

 The displacement of population is the crisis that New Orleans faces.
It is also a national crisis, because the largest port in the United
States cannot function without a city around it. The physical and
business processes of a port cannot occur in a ghost town, and right
now, that is what New Orleans is. It is not about the facilities, and
it is not about the oil. It is about the loss of a city's population
and the paralysis of the largest port in the United States.

 Let's go back to the beginning. The United States historically has
depended on the Mississippi and its tributaries for transport. Barges
navigate the river. Ships go on the ocean. The barges must offload to
the ships and vice versa. There must be a facility to empower this
exchange. It is also the facility where goods are stored in transit.
Without this port, the river can't be used. Protecting that port has
been, from the time of the Louisiana Purchase, a fundamental national
security issue for the United States.

 Katrina has taken out the port -- not by destroying the facilities,
but by rendering the area uninhabited and potentially uninhabitable.
That means that even if the Mississippi remains navigable, the absence
of a port near the mouth of the river makes the Mississippi enormously
less useful than it was. For these reasons, the United States has lost
not only its biggest port complex, but also the utility of its river
transport system -- the foundation of the entire American transport
system. There are some substitutes, but none with sufficient capacity
to solve the problem.

 It follows from this that the port will have to be revived and, one
would assume, the city as well. The ports around New Orleans are
located as far north as they can be and still be accessed by ocean-
going vessels. The need for ships to be able to pass each other in the
waterways, which narrow to the north, adds to the problem. Besides, the
Highway 190 bridge in Baton Rouge blocks the river going north. New
Orleans is where it is for a reason: The United States needs a city
right there.

 New Orleans is not optional for the United States' commercial
infrastructure. It is a terrible place for a city to be located, but
exactly the place where a city must exist. With that as a given, a city
will return there because the alternatives are too devastating. The
harvest is coming, and that means that the port will have to be opened
soon. As in Iraq, premiums will be paid to people prepared to endure
the hardships of working in New Orleans. But in the end, the city will
return because it has to.

 Geopolitics is the stuff of permanent geographical realities and the
way they interact with political life. Geopolitics created New Orleans.
Geopolitics caused American presidents to obsess over its safety. And
geopolitics will force the city's resurrection, even if it is in the
worst imaginable place.


 Send questions or comments on this article to analysis@stratfor.com.

 ************************* *************************
 Sign Up for FREE Weekly Intelligence Reports! STRATFOR now has three 
FREE weekly reports to provide subscribers an inside look into the 
broad scope of issues monitored by our team of analysts in the areas
of global geopolitics, security, and public policy.

 In addition to the Geopolitical Intelligence Report written by 
STRATFOR founder Dr. George Friedman, STRATFOR also offers the 
Terrorism Intelligence Report by Fred Burton, STRATFOR's Vice President 
of Counterterrorism and Corporate Security, and the Public Policy 
Intelligence Report by Vice President of Public Policy Bart Mongoven. 
Have these sent directly to your inbox each week by signing up at: 
http://www.stratfor.com/subscribe_free_intel.php.

 There is no charge to receive these reports